Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÓÇÁ¶õÆ® º¸Ã¶ÀÇ abutment À¯¹«¿¡ µû¸¥ À¯ÇÑ ¿ä¼Ò¹ýÀû ÀÀ·ÂºÐ¼®

FINITE ELEMENT STRESS ANALYSIS OF IMPLANT SUPPORTED PROSTHESIS OR WITHOUT ABUTMENT

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úÀ̽ÄÇÐȸÁö 1997³â 16±Ç 1È£ p.83 ~ 94
Á¤¼ºÁ¶, ÀÌÁرÔ, Á¤ÀçÇå,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¤¼ºÁ¶ (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÀÌÁرԠ(  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Á¤ÀçÇå (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


The attraction to endosseous implants lies in the potential for improved function, improved esthetic, and more favorable stress distribution in the superior prostheses, fixture, and supporting, bone. Implant for, single tooth replace is¢¥ especially needed esthetics, and that was mainly established by use of various superstructure.
The -purpose of this study was to compare the stresses in implant prosthesis and fixture, and Oupporting bone according to with and without abutment between fixture and superstructure.
._ Using. the finite element method, this study modeled .4.0X 14 mm cylindrical type implant
._ fixture-, with the external hexed type of .0.75mm, and two models are completed. Model A¢¥ is without abutment, so implant superstructure is direct connected in fixture,. and Model B is with abutment on the fixture. The vertical load of 200N and 300 lateral load of 10ON was applied ¢¥at. the cusp tip of the, prostheses.
The¢¥,resufs were as follows ;

L Under vertical and lateral loading, the amount of displacement was larger at the model B with abutment than at the model A without abutment.
2. Under vertical and lateral loading, less equivalent stress was represented at the model B with abutment than at ,the model A without abutment.
3. Under vertical and lateral, loading, model B with abutment showed more stress in fastening screw than at the model A without abutment.
4. Under vertical and lateral loading, model B with abutment showed less stress distribution in fastening screw than at the model A without abutment.

As the results of this study, in case of using abutment between implant fixture and final prostheses, large displacement is occured and the stresses is concentrated at the fastening screw.
The other hand, when the implant superstructure is direct connected to implantfixture without abutment, less displacement is occured and the streses is widely distributed to the supporting bone. That results means intermittent abutment acts stress blocker and when the use of abutment, fasening screw fracture more occured than supporting bone
resorption.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸